-

High Calcium levels
Question: Dear Dr. Richards,
I am a new subscriber and already have a question regarding my very
loving
kitty.. Cocoa.
After some blood and urine work, my vet has informed me that Cocoa's
calcium
level is high (13.8), indicating that
he may have some kind of cancer. I'm in shock and am scared to death
that I
may lose him so I've been searching the net for more information.
Unfortunately, I haven't found very much out there and what I have
found
does not sound very promising.
The vet suggested we also do a parathyroid test as it may be the cause
of
his elevated calcium but we won't have the results till next week.
I can't
find anything on the net about the parathyroid. If nothing shows on
this
test, the vet has suggested we do an ultrasound.
The other readings which have variances include:
CGT at 0 (normal range 1
- 7)
BUN at 48 (normal range 15-34)
Creatinine at 2.6 (normal range 0.8 - 2.3)
WBC at 4.2 (normal range 5.5-19.5)
MCH at 13.0 (normal range 13.3 - 17.5)
MCHC at 29.6 (normal range 31 - 36)
onocytes at 5 (normal range 1-4)
Absolute Lymphocyte at 966 (normal range 1500-7000)
Everything else is in line with normal ranges.
He is eating very well but seems to drink a lot of water. I've been
giving
him fluids about every 2-3 days and that has really helped his thirst.
My question is... is there any way the vet could be wrong? Should
we do
another round of blood and urine work?
What percentage of cats with this kind of calcium level actually have
cancer?
Please help.. I'll be lost without him. Thank you. Regards, Karen
Answer: Karen-
In dogs, high calcium levels in the blood stream are most commonly
associated with cancer, especially lymphoma. In cats, high calcium
levels
associated with cancer do occur.. Some sources say that cancer is the
most
common cause of high calcium levels in cats but I think that the most
common current view is that high calcium levels in cats is just about
equally likely to be due to chronic renal failure. In a study by Savary,
et. al., reported in a recent issue of the Journal of Veterinary Medicine,
stones in the urinary tract (uroliths) were also a common cause of
high
calcium levels in cats. Lab error and primary hyperparathyroidism are
the
other causes of high calcium levels in cats. It is important not to
overlook lab error as a possibility before making any decisions based
solely on high calcium levels in the blood stream.
Checking carefully for any evidence of calcium oxalate stones in the
urinary tract (X-rays usually show these stones if they are present),
rechecking the serum calcium level, using an ionized calcium test,
if
possible, would also be a good idea. The ionized calcium more accurately
reflects the "real" calcium level in the blood stream and can help
your vet
distinguish between the possible disorders that lead to high calcium.
Checking the parathyroid hormone levels is also a good idea, so your
vet is
ahead of the curve having already sent off for that test. In cats,
the
parathyroid glands are enlarged enough to palpate when there are
parathyroid tumors, so feeling the neck region for evidence of lumps
is a
good idea, too.
There is enough elevation in the kidney values reported to make kidney
disease a real possibility in your cat. While this isn't as good as
nothing
being wrong, as would be the case with a lab error, it is better than
cancer. There is a lot of information on our site and on the
feline
chronic renal failure site we have a link to on our link page and reviewing
that would be a good idea.
It is hard to be patient and wait for lab results but it is necessary.
Keep
working with your vet to sort through this problem. I am hoping
the
outcome will be better than you are fearing.
Mike Richards, DVM
-
5/15/2000
-
Blood pressure
monitoring
Blood pressure monitoring in dogs and cats will become more common as
time
goes on. At present there are some problems with equipment and there
does
not seem to be a clear consensus on blood pressure normal values.
It is harder to measure blood pressure in dogs and cats than it is in
humans because of the variances in size, anatomy and willingness to
sit
still and allow the process to take place. There are three methods
for
obtaining reasonably accurate blood pressure measurement.
The oldest and most accurate is placement of a catheter directly into
the
artery and direct measurement of the pressure using a manometer. Most
vets
are not really anxious to place arterial catheters in patients for
routine
monitoring of blood pressure.
Two methods of "indirect" blood pressure measurement are also used.
One
uses a Doppler system and the other an oscillometric system. The
oscillometric system is probably more accurate but doesn't work well
for
pets weighing less than fifteen pounds making it impractical for use
in
most cats and many small dogs. It measures both systolic and diastolic
pressure. The Doppler system only measures systolic pressure. It can
be
used in any size patient but is not considered to be as accurate and
requires a trained operator.
The definition of hypertension varies from reference to reference. Dr.
Morgan's "Handbook of Small Animal Practice" lists the range for normal
arterial blood pressure as 130 to 180 for systolic pressure and 60
to 100
for diastolic pressure and makes no distinction between dogs and cats.
I
have seen references that suggest that anything over 120 may be
hypertension in the cat and that the high end of normal systolic pressure
in the dog may be as high as 210. Blood pressure is known to vary among
breeds of dogs and that may explain some of the reported differences.
Blood pressure devices cost between $900 and $3500 new. It is possible
to
buy oscillometric units used from the human market and modify the cuffs
for
pets but the savings aren't all that great after doing that and the
machines are more sensitive to the human blood pressure ranges which
are
lower than those of pets making them a little more inaccurate for vets.
To
be able to monitor blood pressure with reasonable accuracy the cuffs
must
be correctly sized.
One of the problems with veterinary medicine is that this cost must
be
recovered in some manner and the office visit price is usually competitive
in veterinary medicine so that isn't a good place to make it up. But
people
are used to having their blood pressure taken as part of an office
visit at
their doctor's so a separate charge can be hard to justify, too. So
vets
are buying one or two machines that are probably not going to be money
makers and for which the accuracy is a little questionable and normal
values hard to find. Many vets, looking at all of this, opt not to
buy the
machines.
Mike Richards, DVM
What's a titer
Q: Dear Mike, What causes Titer? My Cat tested
Antibody Present 1:6400 Yet none of the other cats (#in 100s) test positive
for FIP, from cattery. Only symptoms - weight loss +dehydration =1.3 lb.
vomiting 5 times three months small amount of sleep in eyes. I changed
diet to yogurt, - boiled rice & chicken, - and I am forcing water.
He is eating these things in quantity like normal within 2 days. Please
help! R.
A: A titer is a measurement of the dilution level
at which antibodies to a disease are still detectable during testing. The
titer values are used to determine the likelihood of a disease. Titers
for the same disease can vary from laboratory to laboratory depending on
how they run the test. Titers for different diseases are not comparable
at all -- a titer of 1:20 is significant in some diseases while a titer
of 1:6400 may be "normal" for another disease. When interpreting titers
it is very important to know what the testing lab considers the normal
levels to be and to consider factors about the disease that may influence
the titer.
For feline infectious peritonitis (FIP) there are several factors to
consider when looking at titer levels. In most labs, titer levels of 1:1600
or less are considered to be normal (or below the range where active infection
is likely based on serology alone). It is also important to consider the
number of cats living in the household with a cat you are testing for FIP.
In multi-cat households the "background" titer level is likely to be higher
in a cat for FIP than it is is a one or two cat household, since exposure
to coronavirus (the type of virus that causes FIP and other enteric infections
in cats) is going to be more likely. So a cat with a titer of 1:6400 in
a household with many cats is less likely to actually have FIP than a cat
living alone with a titer this high. In catteries it is possible that 1:6400
should be considered the "suspicious" level for titers. The last thing
you have to consider is how sick the cat is. In a very sick cat with a
lot of signs of FIP (dehydration, fever, weight loss, lethargy, enlarged
abdomen, etc.) a low titer level has to be taken more seriously than in
a cat that isn't sick. It can be a difficult interpretation in this situation
but that is what you pay your vet for, so make him or her tell you what
it means to them. It can be useful to check the titer again in two or three
weeks in these cases. A rising titer would be meaningful and a falling
titer in the face of the illness worsening may be indicate a very bad short
term prognosis.
Titer levels above 1:3200 are usually considered to be sufficient to
suspect FIP so you do have to take the titer seriously but this test is
inaccurate enough that you should almost never base a diagnosis on titer
alone. Interpreting the result in light of your cat's individual situation
is very important. Again, this is something you should talk to your vet
about and your vet should take the time to tell you what the result means
for your individual cat.
-
Mike Richards, DVM
-
-
Testing for Kidney
failure
-
Q: Hi-
-
I have a 16 yr. old cat who has always
been very healthy. A couple
-
days ago, I noticed that she seemed a little sluggish and just not
-
quite herself. Then she seemed to be having difficulty walking, every
-
movement seemed to be an effort and her breathing seemed very labored.
-
I chose a Vet who comes to the home, to avoid
any stress to Goldie.
-
He looked in her mouth and ears and listened to her heart. He said
-
that she has kidney failure as a result from feline leukemia, is
-
enemic and therefore very weak.
-
I am wondering if such a diagnosis
can be made from the small exam he
-
gave her? Also, Goldie has not been in contact with another cat since
-
1988. How could she have contracted the disease?
-
Lastly, the Vet said she is in the last stages, there is nothing
to
-
do except make her comfortable and watch for signs that would indicate
-
she is suffering. He did prescribe a Steroid to give her a little more
-
energy. Could she already be in the last stages without ever
-
exhibiting any symptoms? If his diagnosis is correct, is this indeed
-
all that can be done?
-
Obviously, I need answers as soon as possible so I can be doing the
-
right thing for Goldie.
-
Thank you for your time
-
Donna
-
-
A: Dear Donna
-
Unless the vet did labwork at your home it is not possible for him to
-
diagnose either kidney failure or feline leukemia from an exam alone. There
-
are blood and saliva tests for feline leukemia which could easily be done
-
by a house call veterinarian at the home. There is also a small portable
-
blood analyzer made for house call veterinarians but some blood would have
-
to be drawn to do the tests.
-
Prior to the availability of good lab machines for use in the clinic and
-
now even for house calls, I used to think that I was pretty good at
-
diagnosing kidney failure from clinical signs in cats. When it became
-
possible to test them quickly enough that I could test prior to treatment
I
-
discovered that much of the time my presumptive diagnosis of renal failure
-
was incorrect in older dehydrated cats.
-
I think it would be a good idea to get a second opinion.
-
Mike Richards, DVM
-
-
-
Positive ELISA
-
Q: My kitten had a positive ELISA test today and I
am going crazy thinking
-
about what this means. My vet told me it does not look good. Please tell
-
me what the chances are of a false positive. I can only hope but I can't
-
bear the thought of losing my baby.
-
Julia
-
-
A: Dear Julia
-
The possibility of a false positive test would depend on what was being
-
tested for.
-
Feline leukemia virus tests are pretty accurate but probably have false
-
positive results one to four times per 1000 tests. The feline leukemia
-
tests are usually directly for viral antigen. Some kittens can probably
-
fight off the virus completely and many others can suppress it sufficiently
-
to keep it out of the bloodstream and not be affected by the virus unless
-
they experience later immune suppression for some reason. It is always
a
-
good idea to retest 3 weeks or more after a positive feline leukemia test
-
to see if the kitten has become negative. I think that the false positive
-
rate is higher when using saliva or tears for testing than when blood is
used.
-
Feline immunodeficiency virus tests are more likely to be false positive,
-
especially in a kitten. This test is for antibody and maternal transfer
of
-
antibody can occur. This gives a positive test result and the kitten may
-
not be infected.
-
Feline heartworm tests using an antigen detecting system have false
-
positive rates similar to feline leukemia tests. Feline heartworm tests
-
that detect antibody to the heartworms have an unknown false positive rate
-
because no one really knows how many cats are exposed to heartworm larvae
-
without ever becoming infected. A positive heartworm test in a cat should
-
be evaluated in conjunction with the presence of clinical signs or other
-
test results such as X-ray changes or ultrasonic identification of heartworms.
-
Your kitten probably had a feline leukemia test since it is done most
-
frequently in kittens of these tests. Retest when your vet thinks it is
-
best to do so and if the second test is positive consider having that
-
confirmed with an alternative test such as IFA testing. If your kitten
is
-
still positive you will have to make plans to deal with that situation.
-
-
Mike Richards, DVM